De Prado methodology · Edge validation
We kill strategies honestly.
Most "profitable" backtests are multiple-testing artifacts. We test not "is PnL positive" but whether the edge survives correction for the number of trials and out-of-sample splits — the Marcos López de Prado standard.
Every strategy runs seven tests: CPCV (purged + embargo), Deflated Sharpe (n_trials correction), PBO via CSCV, MinBTL, factor-alpha, multi-regime and walk-forward. Passing threshold ≈ 6–7 of 7. We always report the number of trials: a "good backtest" ≠ a discovery.
What's in the archive
14 closed tracksPublic — strategies we tested and honestly closed. It is a showcase of the methodology: what a disciplined null looks like and why most ideas do not survive.
Working strategies (LIVE/paper) are in the private section, access on request.
Service: validating your strategy
Send a rule/backtest — we run it through the same scorecard (DSR · PBO · CPCV · MinBTL · multi-regime · walk-forward) with a realistic cost model and tape cross-check, and give an honest verdict: real / artifact / conditional — with numbers and caveats.
- What you get
- a de Prado-format report: scorecard, cost/capacity, failure-modes, verdict
- What we need
- a description of the rule + data/backtest (or access to it)
- Format
- a private report (like this archive, but on your strategy)
Your request goes to our Telegram.